Design by Rhoek.comDesign by Rhoek.com
Design by Rhoek.com
 
  
 Search Design by Rhoek.com Forum
 
  Minimize
Skin design and build by rhoek.com
Skin design and build by rhoek.com
Weather Discussion Minimize
HomeHomeGRIB.US GRIB.US GRIB.US suggest...GRIB.US suggest...ThicknessThickness
Previous
 
Next
New Post
10/24/2008 2:02 AM
 
It would be handy to have 1000/500 hPa thickness overlaid on the mslp chart.  To get 1000/500 hPa thickness you only need mslp and 500 hPa geopotential height.  Thickness can then be fairly well approximated using, for example, an isothermal calculation of 1000 hPa geopotential from the mslp.  I've done this in GRADS and found the output agrees very well with 'real' ncep thickness.  (From the 500 hPa height, you can also calculate wind and vorticity, albeit only geostrophic, but at least you get a feeling for vorticity advection.)  I find frontal analysis much easier with a thickness field.

Somebody suggested sig wave heights, which I can only say is a great idea.

I emailed the suggestion in, but I guess the programmers are a bit busy to read everything in the in tray!

Also, perhaps it might be possible to put surface wind divergence/vorticity in?  Not really as useful as precip, of course, but given that the user has already downloaded surface winds...

Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeGRIB.US GRIB.US GRIB.US suggest...GRIB.US suggest...ThicknessThickness


    Skin design and build by rhoek.com
      
    Skin design and build by rhoek.com
    Home | Grib Data | FAQ | Forum | Downloads | Contact
    Design by Rhoek.com
    Design by Rhoek.com
    Terms | Privacy | GRIB.US Copyright 2005-2011 by GRIB.US
    Design by Rhoek.com